Adam Smith's Invisible Hand theory was also beneficial to the poor. In the Invisble Hand theory, the poor would help themselves. The theory purposes that by letting the economy run freely with no support or guidance, people will buy things from venders and the economy will naturally d flourish as if an invisible hand is guiding it. This will allow for the poor to acquire goods more easily and at a lower price. The Invisible Hand mostly benefitted the poor. Adam Smith developed this theory wanting to give the poor more options. The Invisible Hand allowed the poor to earn money and purchase items with no restraints. The theory included commerce and free trade. This made acquiring everyday items much easier for the poor.
For their time, both of these theory's were revolutionary. They still play a big role in the world today. I believe that both of these options are not perfect and could be made better. But out of the two, Adam Smith's theory is definitely superior. I believe that the collecting and redistributing of wealth would not be liked. People should be able to work hard and earn a lot of money with out having it taken away and given to others who don't work at all. Adam Smith's theory allows the population to earn their own money at their own pace. The beauty of it is that the economy supports itself and naturally flourishes over time. This theory also prevents the poor from having no money at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment